Mullah Krekar, whose real name is Najmuddin Faraj Ahmad, is a Kurdish-Iraqi Islamist militant who is notorious for his links to the extremist group, Ansar al-Islam. He has been living in Norway since 1991 and has been a controversial figure in Norwegian politics for many years. Recently, he has been in the news again, as he is facing criminal charges for making death threats against a Norwegian lawyer. This has led to the question: who is paying for Mulla Krekars advokat?
The Case Against Mulla Krekar
The case against Mulla Krekar is a serious one. He is accused of making death threats against a Norwegian lawyer, Brynjar Meling. Meling has been representing Krekar in a number of legal cases, but the relationship between the two men has deteriorated in recent years. Krekar allegedly made the threats in a conversation with a journalist, who reported them to the police. If found guilty, Krekar could face up to 15 years in prison.
Who is Paying for Mulla Krekars Advokat?
Given that Mulla Krekar has been living in Norway for many years, it is unlikely that he has the financial means to pay for a high-profile lawyer like Brynjar Meling. This has led to speculation that Krekar is receiving financial support from outside sources. Some have suggested that he is receiving funding from extremist groups in the Middle East, while others believe that he is being supported by sympathetic individuals in Norway.
The Role of the Norwegian State
The Norwegian state has a duty to provide legal representation to anyone who is facing criminal charges, regardless of their background or financial situation. However, this does not necessarily mean that the state is paying for Mulla Krekars advokat. In fact, it is unlikely that the state would provide a lawyer like Brynjar Meling, who is one of the most expensive and high-profile lawyers in Norway.
What are the Implications?
The fact that Mulla Krekar is being represented by Brynjar Meling has raised concerns about the role of extremist groups in Norway. It is possible that Krekar is receiving financial support from these groups, which could have serious implications for national security. The case has also highlighted the issue of extremism in Norway, and the difficulties that the authorities face in dealing with individuals who are suspected of having links to extremist groups.
Conclusion
The case against Mulla Krekar is a complex and sensitive one, and the question of who is paying for his legal representation is just one of the many issues that it raises. While it is unlikely that the Norwegian state is funding his defence, the possibility that Krekar is receiving support from extremist groups is a cause for concern. Whatever the outcome of the case, it is clear that the issue of extremism in Norway will continue to be a major challenge for the authorities.